It is not always right to use the products suitable for animals on humans. Under this view, the ways in which experimentation might harm the animal are less morally significant than the potential human benefits from the research. In conclusion, using animals for medical research is ethical and useful because it contributes to scientific development to improve human health. Hobbes, the cat, has been under experimentation for most of his life if not all of it. They have the right not to be used for experimentation.
On the other hand, an argumentative essay on animal testing can be written from the point of view of advantages of the use of animals in medicine. Animal rights, Animal testing, Animal welfare 1264 Words 4 Pages Mchugh English 121-G15 Persuasive Argument Essay Animal Testing: Behind the Experiments Cruel, inhumane, and unnecessary. Few people in this world recognize the truth behind animal experimentation. Even if Hobbes lives through the whole ordeal, they are going to kill him to see which organs the shampoo. Animal testing is immoral and unreliable.
Ethics in Animal Testing If the essay is written in support of animal testing, this is one of the easiest points. The major difference is they shampoo their own dogs to see how it smells after being cleaned off with water. The latter claim that it is cruel and inhumane to test the products using animals, and they call for the development of the new alternative techniques which will eliminate the need in animal testing. Animal testing is not benefit for humans, and even, it can harm humans! Some people think that animal testing is obsolete in this day and age but it isn 't obsolete because animal testing helps determine what chemicals are potentially harmful to humans, it helps determine what medicines are potentially safe for human use, and it helps advance… 878 Words 4 Pages lot of different types of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. To provide herself much additional credit, she quotes a specialist who additionally accepts animal testing is truly not beneficial. On the one hand, some may argue that this violates animal rights, and how there are better ways of going about research and teaching.
Animal rights, Animal testing, Chemistry 1176 Words 3 Pages Animal Testing Why cosmetics on animals has been banned in the E. Women all over the world began using Thalidomide to help them avoid restless sleep and to combat the morning sickness; the effects were devastating. Since then, animal testing is seen to be the most efficient way to developing new drugs and products, policy makers are yet to be convinced that using animal for testing causes serious harm more to animals. Financial losses are huge even for common dissection classes. Supporters of animal testing have many arguments of why they believe it is justified. Some people would say testing products on any kind of animal is unmoral and wrong.
There is an assumption that testing can be conducted on cell organisms, but it is doubtful that it will work, as those tissues cannot be tested for blindness or blood pressure issues. Using these methods does not require a living animal in the laboratory. Besides, development of new medical products contributes to the prevention of species extinction. Yet controversy erupts when animals are subjected to experimentation for the sole purpose of gaining knowledge. A common task for the students is to work on an argumentative paper; thus, it is essential to determine and specify a definite position and then develop a thesis statement with the supporting arguments appropriately. Some believe that it is right completely, some that it is right but only under certain circumstances and others that believe that all animal testing is wrong and will go to extraordinary lengths to stop it.
The life cycles of animals are shorter than those of people; thus, the experiments on them are more reasonable than those on humans. This research concludes that animal testing can be both beneficial but also very crucial, should be banned at some point; however, the substitute method has found some defect which leads that medical researchers should modify the substitute method in order to animal testing to be substituted. Medical procedures can involve anything from surgery to simple things like how doctors take your temperature. As death may only be a miracle for those animals because many are tortured in ongoing experiments that may last. If humans were treated the same way it would be seen as inhumane and would be stopped immediately, so why should animals be any different? Well I have and it is heartbreaking and immoral.
Animals are not required in animal testing, but people seem to ignore this statement and test on animals anyway. My paper got the highest grade in the class. It is a debate that has taken place for several years and it continues to be an ongoing battle. Millions of animals suffer from experimentation each year, but that number is not even precise since there are several countries that do not publish their data. Yet we test drugs and products on these relatives.
Various scientists determined to improve the field of medicine conduct medical experiments using specific animals like rats or monkeys to develop an in-depth understanding of pathology and pharmacology effect of the drugs. Many people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. For example, Bantwal embodies an ethos, otherwise referred to as the argument by character in her writing. T Page, Less than 2% of human illnesses 1. Animal experimentation is a contentious issue, but it boils down to two essential questions: does it work, and is it ethical? The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body of each is different. After all of the reasons of why animal testing is ridiculous, hopefully a law will soon stop the cruel process. But scientists on the other hand, believe animal testing is the best way to discover medical breakthroughs.